Let's look, shall we?
Name | PAs | Avg/SLG/OBP | K:BB | XBH-RBI | SB/Err |
Manzella | 209 | .212/.259/.254 | 57:10 | 6-16 | 0/8 |
Sanchez | 128 | .291/.331/.376 | 22:6 | 8-14 | 0/2 |
Some key splits to consider:
Against RHPs:
Name | PAs | Avg/SLG/OBP | K:BB | XBH-RBI | BABIP |
Manzella | 164 | .168/.211/.201 | 54:6 | 3-11 | .247 |
Sanchez | 84 | .262/.311/.369 | 12:5 | 7-11 | .306 |
Against LHPs:
Name | PAs | Avg/SLG/OBP | K:BB | XBH-RBI | BABIP |
Manzella | 45 | .375/.432/.450 | 3:4 | 3-5 | .405 |
Sanchez | 38 | .333/.351/.361 | 10:1 | 1-3 | .462 |
w/RISP:
Name | PAs | Avg/SLG/OBP | K:BB | XBH-RBI | BABIP |
Manzella | 53 | .196/.245/.239 | 14:4 | 2-14 | .257 |
Sanchez | 35 | .233/.303/.367 | 4:2 | 3-14 | .269 |
Is this a definitive look? Hell, and no, it's not. Are we dealing with a ridiculously small sample size? Hell, and yes, we are. But at least they're comparable sample sizes. I give the edge to Sanchez, but I'm also not sure what you do with Manzella.